[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Dan Vint scripsit:
> I was sort of looking at the targetNamespace as providing some of the
> benefit of the public identifier if you followed the process of putting a
> version number in the URL and changed it with each significant change.
So it can, provided you remember that its presence is merely a hint and
Schema-based tools need not respect it.
RFC 3151 (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3151.txt) explains how to map a
public identifier (either an FPI or not) into a URI suitable for use
either as a namespace name or as a schema identification hint.
> But how many people are working with more than one schema?
For me it's routine to use different schemata at different stages of
processing.
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan jcowan@reutershealth.com
Be yourself. Especially do not feign a working knowledge of RDF where
no such knowledge exists. Neither be cynical about RELAX NG; for in
the face of all aridity and disenchantment in the world of markup,
James Clark is as perennial as the grass. --DeXiderata, Sean McGrath
|
