xml-dev - duh! Re: [xml-dev] Roger Costello: My Version of "Why use OWL?"

duh! Re: [xml-dev] Roger Costello: My Version of "Why use OWL?"

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: "XML DEV" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Subject: duh! Re: [xml-dev] Roger Costello: My Version of "Why use OWL?"
From: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@openhealth.org>
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 17:27:37 -0400
References: <3EA963E5.527F5F39@mitre.org> <3EAAA9FA.64DEBA35@fiduciary.com> <065901c30c2d$b9041520$b6f5d3ce@L565>

err, that's:
> 
> <owl:Class rdf:ID="DutiableItem">
>     <owl:oneOf rdf:parseType="Literal">
>         <owl:Thing
> rdf:resource="http://www.example.org/RogersOntology#camera"/>
>         ...
>     </owl:oneOf>
> </owl:Class>

<owl:Class rdf:ID="DutiableItem">
      <owl:oneOf rdf:parseType="Collection">
          <owl:Thing
  rdf:resource="http://www.example.org/RogersOntology#camera"/>
         ...
      </owl:oneOf>
  </owl:Class>

Jonathan

References:
- Roger Costello: My Version of "Why use OWL?"
  - From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Roger Costello: My Version of "Why use OWL?"
  - From: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@openhealth.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Roger Costello: My Version of "Why use OWL?"
Next by Date: and duh! Re: [xml-dev] Statistical vs "semantic web" approaches to making sense of the Net
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Roger Costello: My Version of "Why use OWL?"
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Roger Costello: My Version of "Why use OWL?"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread