xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Round Tripping XML via low-end version?

Re: [xml-dev] Round Tripping XML via low-end version?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Round Tripping XML via low-end version?
From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 22:46:26 +0000
In-reply-to: <r01050400-1025-7F503D9C704C11D794E90003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
References: <20030416202125.GP14888@skunk.reutershealth.com> <r01050400-1025-7F503D9C704C11D794E90003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>

"Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> wrote:
| jcowan@reutershealth.com (John Cowan) writes:

|>> There's no risk of data loss [from processing WordML], at least based 
|>> on the current (scant) information.
|>
|> That would be fine if it were documented, but according to report it is 
|> not.
| 
| Not well, perhaps, but it's hardly random.  I suspect it will keep a lot
| of people in business for a long time, with or without documentation.

Time to resurrect the Rainbow DTDs?

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] Round Tripping XML via low-end version?
  - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Round Tripping XML via low-end version?
  - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>

Prev by Date: Re: FXSL library
Next by Date: XML 1.1 grinds to halt?
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Round Tripping XML via low-end version?
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Round Tripping XML via low-end version?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread