RE: [xml-dev] Is the XML Linking WG still working in XPointer xpointer() scheme ?

["Rodriguez, Sergio" <srodriguez@canella.com.gt>]

Thanks, Henry.

-----Original Message-----
From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
To: Rodriguez, Sergio
Cc: 'XML Dev '
Sent: 30/04/2003 03:42 AM
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Is the XML Linking WG still working in XPointer
xpointer() scheme ?

"Rodriguez, Sergio" <srodriguez@canella.com.gt> writes:

> Hi, all.
> 
>   I was studying the XPointer xpointer() scheme W3C Working Draft of
19
> December 2002 <http://www.w3.org/TR/xptr-xpointer/> and I found in the
> section "Status of this document" the following:
> 
> <quote>
> This document has been produced by the W3C XML Linking Working Group
as part
> of the XML Activity.
> </quote>
> 
>   And in the *home page* of the XML Linking WG (W3C XML Pointer, XML
Base
> and XML Linking) <http://www.w3.org/XML/Linking>, it says:
> 
> <quote>
> The XML Linking Working Group has completed its work and is no longer
> active.
> </quote>
> 
>   So, who's going to finish the XPointer xpointer() Scheme Spec??!! or
am I
> missing something?

You're not missing anything.  The W3C Team, in particular the XML
Activity, are responsible for coming up with a proposal for what will
happen next with this work, and then the W3C membership will decide.
No estimate yet of when this will happen.

ht
-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of
Edinburgh
                      Half-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is
forged spam]