[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
On Mon, 5 May 2003, Paul Jensen wrote:
> > http://www.artima.com/intv/plain4.html
> | Andy Hunt: Yeah, a genuine grammar. I want to be able to type
> | something simple and easy for me. I don't care if it's easy for the
> | tool to parse, that's the tool's problem. I want it to be easy for
> | me to write. And in cases like that, it's really the case of the
> | programmer saying, "Oh look, here's an XML parser. I can just take
> | XML files. That's easier." So one programmer in one context puts a
> | burden on the other 100,000 programmers trying to use it.
>
> Spot on. I certainly remember feeling a similar sentiment when I began
> using Ant. I want to write my Ant buildfiles in "Ant", not in "XML".
That's precisely what I don't want to do. The best thing about XML
configuration files is that I already know the syntax -- I don't need to
remember whether it's #, //, or ; that marks a comment, whether I need a
special character at the end of every line, what character I use to quote
strings, how I do escaping, or anything. With XML files, the syntax is
standard and universal.
(Plus, XML-aware editors make it easy to only view the parts of a large
configuration file that matter to me, while ignoring the uninteresting
parts.)
--
Mike Kozlowski
http://www.klio.org/mlk/
|
