[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
At 00:57 09/05/2003 -0700, Michael Rys wrote:
>I would also like to point out that the WG takes critique seriously if it
>comes in through the proper channels, although at this stage, there will
>be a big reluctance to change the language unless there are real bugs
>(such as the missing static type to denote untyped complex types) or it
>can easily be done. However, also note that there are several people that
>see XML Schema mentioned in the documents and just shut down. If you would
>look at the documents closely, you would find with some bugs as the one
>mentioned above actually works very well on just untyped data.
The data model ties query and xslt v.tightly into the types of xsd?
If xsd goes down the drain, it would clearly take xslt with it.
regards daveP
|
