[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Michael Kay wrote:
>>Though the transformation APIs are alive and well, Sun
>>doesn't seem to use this acronym for the Transformation API
>>for XML frequently anymore. For example, it only shows up in
>>the spec for JAXP 1.1 three times (once for the TrAX mailing
>>list, twice in the javax.xml.transform.sax.SAXSource
>>Javadoc). It only shows up twice (on same page) in the
>>Javadocs for 1.4.1 and 1.4.2 for javax.xml.transform.sax.SAXSource.
>>
>>Any insight on this?
>>
>>
>
>Yes, it's best to refer to it now as "the JAXP transformation API" if
>you want anyone to know what you are talking about.
>
This is a bit inconvenient if TrAX wants, in a similar manner as SAX, to
cross Java-world frontiers. Languages like Perl or C++ would need a
common transformation API too, sooner or later.
Petr
--
Petr Cimprich
Ginger Alliance
www.gingerall.com
|
