xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] ANN: owl.dtd

Re: [xml-dev] ANN: owl.dtd

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] ANN: owl.dtd
From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 17:08:10 +0000
In-reply-to: <000f01c32347$4ed94d60$6401a8c0@tbp1>
References: <3ECFD6EE.D9C06AD@mitre.org> <02f401c3223a$6bfdab60$b6f5d3ce@L565> <026e01c32342$6fd8d1c0$4bc8a8c0@AlletteSystems.com> <000f01c32347$4ed94d60$6401a8c0@tbp1>

"Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net> wrote:

| Whoa, hold up there, Rick.  How about xslt (and therefore Schematron!)?
| There is no useful schema because any elements and attributes can be put 
| in the document. 

Those elements and attributes are literals from XSLT's pov.  So treat them
as such in the schema aimed at answering questions of the form "is this a
structurally valid XSLT instance?"

References:
- ANN: owl.dtd
  - From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@mitre.org>
- Re: [xml-dev] ANN: owl.dtd
  - From: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@openhealth.org>
- Re: [xml-dev] ANN: owl.dtd
  - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
- Re: [xml-dev] ANN: owl.dtd
  - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Ordinary (was Re: [xml-dev] ANN: owl.dtd)
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] ANN: owl.dtd
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Ordinary (was Re: [xml-dev] ANN: owl.dtd)
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] ANN: owl.dtd
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread