[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> wrote:
| I simply mean that it is intended to be fairly easy to evolve one's
| document type to make it RDF-compatible.
By namespacing everything that comes to hand in document instances?
Thanks, but no thanks.
| If RDF/XML had been designed simply as a syntax for capturing the RDF
| knowledge model, like XTM, it would be a good deal more rigid and
| "meta" than it is. But that wasn't the idea.
More's the pity.
|