xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Choosing when to namespace (was Re: Vocabulary Combination

Re: [xml-dev] Choosing when to namespace (was Re: Vocabulary Combination

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: Seairth Jacobs <seairth@seairth.com>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Choosing when to namespace (was Re: Vocabulary Combination)
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 14:24:30 -0700
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
In-reply-to: <005201c32611$d9c59510$a000a8c0@SeairthA31>
References: <1E0CC447E59C974CA5C7160D2A2854EC098300@SJMEMXMB04.stjude.sjcrh.local> <005201c32611$d9c59510$a000a8c0@SeairthA31>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312

Seairth Jacobs wrote:

> And then nothing.  The whole purpose of the restrictions is to dissallow
> such use.  RNA does not have defined meaning when inside a document of
> another vocabulary.  If you encountered such a thing, it might _look like_
> RNA, but it would not _be_ RNA.

The notion of publishing a vocabulary and saying "it can't be embedded" 
seems to me profoundly weird.  I mean really *distinctly* weird.  -Tim

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] Choosing when to namespace (was Re: Vocabulary Combination)
  - From: "Seairth Jacobs" <seairth@seairth.com>

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] Choosing when to namespace (was Re: Vocabulary Combination)
  - From: "Hunsberger, Peter" <Peter.Hunsberger@stjude.org>
- Re: [xml-dev] Choosing when to namespace (was Re: Vocabulary Combination)
  - From: "Seairth Jacobs" <seairth@seairth.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Vocabulary Combination
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Vocabulary Combination
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Choosing when to namespace (was Re: Vocabulary Combination)
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Choosing when to namespace (was Re: Vocabulary Combination)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread