Lists Home |
Date Index |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
/ "Dare Obasanjo" <email@example.com> was heard to say:
| This seems like a horrible idea. I sincerely hope the the working
| group does not alter the data model in such a short sighted manner
| which unnecesarily tightly couples it to W3C XML Schema while adding
| a heedless burden on implementers.
Another WG member pointed out in private mail that I may be mistaken about
our consensus position. My apologies.
I'll move this issue back into the "technical" pile and see what
BTW, cross-posting to xml-dev and public-qt-comments is probably a bad idea.
I've sent this message as two separate posts to remove the cross-post.
| From: Norman Walsh on behalf of Norman Walsh
| Sent: Thu 6/5/2003 8:27 AM
| To: John Cowan
| Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org
| Subject: [xml-dev] Re: XPath Data Model proposal
| / John Cowan <email@example.com> was heard to say:
| | In my previous posting, archived at
| | http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2003May/0169.html ,
| | I forgot to mention that xsi:nil should also be recognized directly
| | from the Infoset.
| Yes, thank you. That's been pointed out several times and was, in
| fact, supposed to be fixed before the LC draft, but somehow I missed
| Be seeing you,
Be seeing you,
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM | Words--so innocent and powerless they are, as
XML Standards Architect | standing in a dictionary, how potent for good
Web Tech. and Standards | and evil they become, in the hands of one who
Sun Microsystems, Inc. | knows how to use them!--Nathaniel Hawthorne
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----