[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Dare Obasanjo wrote:
>
> However it is true that XPath is now strongly typed and no longer weakly typed which is probably a rude shock for users of XPath/XSLT 1.0
>
IMO, the rude shock is that XPath 2.0 has kept the name XPath giving the
false impression that XPath/XSLT 1.0 users would need to migrate from
one to the other!
To me they are different languages and there is no special reason to
move to XPath 2.0 (unless of course you really need its features).
Eric
--
Lisez-moi sur XMLfr.
http://xmlfr.org/index/person/eric+van+der+vlist/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Upcoming Schema languages tutorial (registration open):
- July 7th (Portland, OR) http://makeashorterlink.com/?K27A527A4
- August 4th (Montreal, Canada) http://makeashorterlink.com/?U28A217A4
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
