[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
"Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com> writes:
> > To me they are different languages and there is no special reason to
> > move to XPath 2.0 (unless of course you really need its features).
>
> There are only ever two possible reasons to move from XXX 1.0 to XXX
> 2.0: either you need the new features of the new version, or you are
> obliged to move forwards because everyone else is doing so.
Just as long as "everyone else" doesn't include the maintainer of the
XXX 1.0 processor you use.
Ari.
|