xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Doc vs. Data

Re: [xml-dev] Doc vs. Data

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: ari@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (K. Ari Krupnikov), xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Doc vs. Data
From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 13:56:11 -0400
In-reply-to: <m3n0grno1f.fsf@t-port.lib.aero>
References: <01dc01c32d46$589a8c70$6401a8c0@pcukmka><m3n0grno1f.fsf@t-port.lib.aero>

At 10:44 AM -0700 6/9/03, K. Ari Krupnikov wrote:

>Just as long as "everyone else" doesn't include the maintainer of the
>XXX 1.0 processor you use.

Are any of the open source XSLT processors clean enough to be 
plausibly forked? The only one I've spent any time exploring (Saxon) 
gave me shivers, it was so convoluted.
-- 

   Elliotte Rusty Harold
   elharo@metalab.unc.edu
   Processing XML with Java (Addison-Wesley, 2002)
   http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xmljava
   http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0201771861/cafeaulaitA

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] Doc vs. Data
  - From: ari@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (K. Ari Krupnikov)

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] Doc vs. Data
  - From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Doc vs. Data
  - From: ari@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (K. Ari Krupnikov)

Prev by Date: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Doc vs. Data
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Doc vs. Data
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread