xml-dev - Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0

Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
From: "Dimitre Novatchev" <dnovatchev@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 21:29:28 +0200
References: <B885BEDCB3664E4AB1C72F1D85CB29F80648446D@RED-MSG-10.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <3EE628F4.7020507@bruchez.org>
Sender: news <news@main.gmane.org>

> In passing, you can use XSLT in
> a very imperative style, and many people just use it this way.

What do you mean by that? Can you provide examples?


=====
Cheers,

Dimitre Novatchev.
http://fxsl.sourceforge.net/ -- the home of FXSL

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
  - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
  - From: Erik Bruchez <erik@bruchez.org>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
Next by Date: Status of W3C Open Digital Rights Language (ODRL)
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS