[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 07:55, Joe English wrote:
> Mike Fitzgerald wrote:
> > Bob Foster wrote:
> > > From: "Mike Fitzgerald"
> > > Also, RELAX NG lacks the precise occurrence restraints of XML
> > > Schema that is, no minOccurs/maxOccurs. RNG supports only the common RE
> > > or DTD constraints ? * + as <optional>, <zeroOrMore>, and <oneOrMore>.
> > >
> > > Yes, but that's just shorthand; it doesn't add any additional capability.
> >
> > In some respects, it is shorthand, e.g.:
> >
> > ? is <optional> is minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1"
> >
> > but you can't say a min of 9 occurrences with a max of 12 in RELAX NG; you
> > can in XML Schema with minOccurs="9"/maxOccurs="12". However, M-N
> > constraints are on the official docket for RELAX NG as a separate spec.
>
>
> What are the real-world use cases of minOccurs and maxOccurs?
> In my experience, occurrence constraints specifying anything
> other than zero, one, or many are almost always an indication
> of a bad design decision somewhere in the system.
>
> (Or maybe that *is* the use case? To be able to accurately
> describe badly normalized legacy RDBMSs and other such things?)
>
or there might just be a poor mapping from a well designed and
normalised rdbms to xml
something that concerns me a lot and i'm looking into
rick
>
> --Joe English
>
> jenglish@flightlab.com
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
|
