[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>,<xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Subject: RE: [xml-dev] modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
- From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 20:15:24 -0700
- Thread-index: AcM2Bp6nomxhAN4+QA+U/HtNgC5iXgAChxYw
- Thread-topic: [xml-dev] modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@simonstl.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 7:04 PM
> To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> Subject: Re: [xml-dev] modeling, validating and documenting
> an xml grammar
>
> >Nobody's refuted the calendar set of examples.
>
> Sure, it's useful. Does it belong in a schema describing
> markup? No, I don't think so. I don't think it adds any
> more value than the current calendar disaster the WXS
> datatypes have already created with gHorribleKludge.
What disaster?
--
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM
You will always find something in the last place you look.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
|
