OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

 


 

   RE: [xml-dev] xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]
  • To: "Erik Bruchez" <erik@bruchez.org>,<xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
  • Subject: RE: [xml-dev] xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
  • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
  • Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 10:53:24 -0700
  • Thread-index: AcM2irsr072OGe1RQ6CWi1yGaoSemgAAPLLx
  • Thread-topic: [xml-dev] xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0

<broken-record>This mentality is everything that is wrong with XML development today</broken-record>

________________________________

From: Erik Bruchez [mailto:erik@bruchez.org]
Sent: Thu 6/19/2003 10:45 AM
To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0



Uche Ogbuji wrote:


 >>it is definitely not standard
 >
 > What do you mean?  What do you call "standard"?

No time to go through the archives so here is my "facile" answer: I
call standard a specification released by one of the major standard
bodies out there, such as W3C, ECMA, ISO, etc. I understand why this
may or may not be important to different people so no need to start a
big argument here, but if you can summarize your position in a
sentence or two go ahead.






 

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS