[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- To: "Erik Bruchez" <erik@bruchez.org>,<xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Subject: RE: [xml-dev] xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
- From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 10:53:24 -0700
- Thread-index: AcM2irsr072OGe1RQ6CWi1yGaoSemgAAPLLx
- Thread-topic: [xml-dev] xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
<broken-record>This mentality is everything that is wrong with XML development today</broken-record>
________________________________
From: Erik Bruchez [mailto:erik@bruchez.org]
Sent: Thu 6/19/2003 10:45 AM
To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
Uche Ogbuji wrote:
>>it is definitely not standard
>
> What do you mean? What do you call "standard"?
No time to go through the archives so here is my "facile" answer: I
call standard a specification released by one of the major standard
bodies out there, such as W3C, ECMA, ISO, etc. I understand why this
may or may not be important to different people so no need to start a
big argument here, but if you can summarize your position in a
sentence or two go ahead.
|
