xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0

Re: [xml-dev] xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 16:13:45 -0400
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE022DC471@hq1.pcmail.ingr.com>
References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE022DC471@hq1.pcmail.ingr.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

Bullard, Claude L (Len) scripsit:

> Ever wonder why a consortium needs to be private 
> if all of the competitors of worth are members? 
> Who or what is the monster to be feared in this 
> cartoon?

Their own managements, to be sure.  By maintaining secrecy, W3C technical
folks can prevent press wars.

-- 
John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>     http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
  - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
  - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread