xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0

Re: [xml-dev] xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 06:34:19 +0700
In-reply-to: <002601c3371d$814778f0$6401a8c0@pcukmka>
References: <002601c3371d$814778f0$6401a8c0@pcukmka>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030225

Michael Kay wrote:

> W3C arguably goes beyond this: it requires multiple implementations of a
> specification before the spec goes from Candidate Rec to Rec status.

To be more precise, I believe what it requires is multiple 
implementations _of each feature_ of a spec.  This is rather different 
from requiring multiple complete implementations of a spec.

James

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
  - From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Create XML
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] The burning XML-DEV question of Where is Australia?(was Re: [xml-dev] ANN: Namespace Routing Language)
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread