[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
jonathan@openhealth.org (Jonathan Borden) writes:
>You are not the first to desire this. Indeed the concept of SGML
>"Groves" was intended to allow a full fidelity representation via an
>API of an SGML document (or any arbitrary subset as desired).
I agree that I'm not the first to desire this, but at the same time
Groves is a lousy comparison. I'm focusing on concrete characters, only
then permitting abstraction, while Groves starts with the abstraction
and lets you reach full fidelity only afterward.
--
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org
|
