[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
That would suggest that the problem today is not
technical or political, but a matter of education.
There simply are XML languages for which CSS is
not useful or available. There are applications
of CSS which are simpler and more elegant. Without
discrimination, one will stumble.
A spork is a technically effective tool, but not
well-liked.
len
From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@simonstl.com]
Maybe more XML folks should spend time on web design lists and watch the
cycle of people trying to decide if this weird pointy XSLT stuff is worth
learning, and what it costs. Some people do make it past the learning
curve, while lots of other people wonder why this extra layer of stuff is
needed (especially in IE) to work with XML.
|
