xml-dev - Re: Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: [xml-dev] the web client in

Re: Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: [xml-dev] the web client in

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Subject: Re: Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: [xml-dev] the web client interface was RE: [xml-dev] Two link questions)
From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:27:57 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: "xml-dev@lists.xml.org" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE022DC630@hq1.pcmail.ingr.com>

So to summarize: you say, based on experience, indemnification against,
e.g., patent suits, is necessary.

I don't know who (if anyone) is doing that.  Maybe IBM is; I don't know.
	/r$

References:
- Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: [xml-dev] the web client interface was RE: [xml-dev] Two link questions)
  - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: [xml-dev] the web client interface was RE: [xml-dev] Two link questions)
Next by Date: RE: Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: [xml-dev] the web client interface was RE: [xml-dev] Two link questions)
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: [xml-dev] the web client interface was RE: [xml-dev] Two link questions)
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: [xml-dev]the web client interface was RE: [xml-dev] Two link questions)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread