xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: [xml-dev]the web

Re: [xml-dev] Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: [xml-dev]the web

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>,'Rich Salz' <rsalz@datapower.com>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: [xml-dev]the web client interface was RE: [xml-dev] Two link questions)
From: Jay Vaughan <jv@access-music.de>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 18:39:32 +0200
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE022DC630@hq1.pcmail.ingr.com>
References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE022DC630@hq1.pcmail.ingr.com>

At 10:20 -0500 23/7/2003, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
>Changing the topic line so Jay can relieve his boredom
>by the available means.

Oh, that helps, thanks.

This license discussion is about XML how exactly?  Maybe I'm missing something.

-- 

;

Jay Vaughan
r&d>>music:technology:synthesizers - www.access-music.de/
                 *

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: [xml-dev]the web client interface was RE: [xml-dev] Two link questions)
  - From: Rick Marshall <rjm@zenucom.com>

References:
- Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: [xml-dev] the web client interface was RE: [xml-dev] Two link questions)
  - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] the web client interface was RE: [xml-dev] Two link questions
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: [xml-dev]the web client interface was RE: [xml-dev] Two link questions)
Previous by thread: Re: Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: [xml-dev] the web client interface was RE: [xml-dev] Two link questions)
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: [xml-dev]the web client interface was RE: [xml-dev] Two link questions)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread