xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: [xml-dev]the web

Re: [xml-dev] Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: [xml-dev]the web

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: veillard@redhat.com, "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: [xml-dev]the web client interface was RE: [xml-dev] Two link questions)
From: Jay Vaughan <jv@access-music.de>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 18:41:03 +0200
Cc: "'Rich Salz'" <rsalz@datapower.com>, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
In-reply-to: <20030723115129.C11607@redhat.com>
References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE022DC633@hq1.pcmail.ingr.com><20030723115129.C11607@redhat.com>

>   Hum, we always seems to have very very different perception of
>what reality is. Seen a customer of Microsoft or IBM who managed
>to sue them because the software was not what they though they bought ?

Please tell me how I can sue Microsoft using XML.  Thanks.

-- 

;

Jay Vaughan
r&d>>music:technology:synthesizers - www.access-music.de/
                 *

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: [xml-dev] the web client interface was RE: [xml-dev] Two link questions)
  - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: [xml-dev] the web client interface was RE: [xml-dev] Two link questions)
  - From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: [xml-dev]the web client interface was RE: [xml-dev] Two link questions)
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: [xml-dev] the web client interface was RE: [xml-dev] Two link questions)
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: [xml-dev] the web client interface was RE: [xml-dev] Two link questions)
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: [xml-dev] the web client interface was RE: [xml-dev] Two link questions)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread