xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: [xml-dev] the we

Re: [xml-dev] Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: [xml-dev] the we

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: [xml-dev] the web client interface was RE: [xml-dev] Two link questions)
From: ari@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (K. Ari Krupnikov)
Date: 23 Jul 2003 09:01:33 -0700
In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE022DC633@hq1.pcmail.ingr.com>
References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE022DC633@hq1.pcmail.ingr.com>
Sender: ari@lib.aero
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2

"Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com> writes:

> intended, but that is how open source can become a credible 
> competitor. 

Following Dare's lead, I'll ask Len what world he lives in. "Can
become"? Time to get your head out of the sand.

Ari.

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: [xml-dev] the web client interface was RE: [xml-dev] Two link questions)
  - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: [xml-dev] the web client interface was RE: [xml-dev] Two link questions)
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: [xml-dev] the web client interface was RE: [xml-dev] Two link questions)
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: [xml-dev] the web client interface was RE: [xml-dev] Two link questions)
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: [xml-dev] the web client interface was RE: [xml-dev] Two link questions)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread