xml-dev - RE: [xml-dev] Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: [xml-dev] the web

RE: [xml-dev] Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: [xml-dev] the web

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: [xml-dev] the web client interface was RE: [xml-dev] Two link questions)
From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 12:28:03 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: "'veillard@redhat.com'" <veillard@redhat.com>, "xml-dev@lists.xml.org" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE022DC637@hq1.pcmail.ingr.com>

> Because the risk is possible, not having
> covered it means the business model (not the software product)
> is not credible.

"not credible" is way too strong; perhaps "less credible"
	/r$

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: [xml-dev] the web client interface was RE: [xml-dev] Two link questions)
  - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: [xml-dev] the web client interface was RE: [xml-dev] Two link questions)
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] the web client interface was RE: [xml-dev] Two link questions
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: [xml-dev] the web client interface was RE: [xml-dev] Two link questions)
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: [xml-dev] the web client interface was RE: [xml-dev] Two link questions)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread