xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] DTDs: Teilite vs. Sdocbook

Re: [xml-dev] DTDs: Teilite vs. Sdocbook

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>,xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] DTDs: Teilite vs. Sdocbook
From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@datadirect-technologies.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 17:35:42 -0400
In-reply-to: <87brva5sju.fsf@nwalsh.com>
References: <6.0.0.12.0.20030731162143.051223c8@ncmail.datadirect-technologies.com><6.0.0.12.0.20030730092327.04a51e78@incoming.verizon.net><6.0.0.12.0.20030731162143.051223c8@ncmail.datadirect-technologies.com>

At 04:51 PM 7/31/2003, Norman Walsh wrote:

>Who's elements ya callin' irrelevant, pal? :-)

I agree. All elements are relevant. Let's automatically generate a DTD that 
encompasses the Cartesian Cross-product of the XHTML 1.0, TEI, and DocBook 
DTDs.

Jonathan
(who has been muttering a lot about "undesirable elements" lately....)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] DTDs: Teilite vs. Sdocbook
  - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] DTDs: Teilite vs. Sdocbook
  - From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@datadirect-technologies.com>
- DTDs: Teilite vs. Sdocbook
  - From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@datadirect-technologies.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] DTDs: Teilite vs. Sdocbook
  - From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] more politics
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] DTDs: Teilite vs. Sdocbook
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] DTDs: Teilite vs. Sdocbook
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread