xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subsetof a W

Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subsetof a W

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: Allen Razdow <arazdow@mathsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subsetof a W3C XML Schema?)
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 17:52:51 -0700
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
In-reply-to: <CBEAE06ADC8F9A4BB9E92B4441FA90BE3C7B1E@mercury.mathsoft.com>
References: <CBEAE06ADC8F9A4BB9E92B4441FA90BE3C7B1E@mercury.mathsoft.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624

Allen Razdow wrote:

>  In contrast, XML represents data
> as annotated trees in a standard syntax ruled by Schemas

No, not ruled by Schemas.  A substantial proportion of XML has never 
felt the touch of a Schema of any kind and works fine.

-- 
Cheers, Tim Bray
         (ongoing fragmented essay: http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/)

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?)
  - From: "Allen Razdow" <arazdow@mathsoft.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Defining non-WXS datatypes
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subsetof a W3C XML Schema?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread