[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Bob Foster wrote:
>
> > / Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> was heard to say:
> > | on the context in which it's going to be used. Perhaps a new datatype
> > | library can define QNames in a different way, one that includes a
> > | normalized version that's a legal representation (e.g. {uri}name).
> >
> > The problem with a lexical form for QNames is that you want them to be
> > recognized in content, which means you need to start them with a
> > markup character, which is a can of worms no matter how you look at
> > it.
>
> I think Jeni is talking about a datatype library that defines an internal,
> canonical representation of QNames used for validation. Forming the
> representation requires document context.
That does not follow from her text.
...
|
