[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
james.anderson@setf.de (james anderson) writes:
>despite the truism, that the generic identifer is just a special
>attribute, what is the advantage to making the universal depend on the
>ideosyncratic?
That it's local.
I guess I just don't value the universal enough to participate in your
world.
>> >is /@ that much more difficult than / ?
>>
>> What language are you speaking? If that's XPath, I didn't think we
>> were in the classic elements/attributes tussle.
>
>think again.
I guess you're not fond of architectural forms either?
--
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org
|
