[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Somebody stick a fork in MPEG. It's done. In fact its way overcooked.
Like a dinosaur brain that hasn't yet got the message that its dead
yet. --courtesy dept of redundancy dept. Better yet, require it carry
a poison warning symbol.
Taps, please,
Rex
At 8:51 AM -0500 8/5/03, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
>Then, should the patent holders decide to
>work with the W3C or other organization to create a standard binary
>for XML, they will submit the patented materials as royalty-free
>submissions.
>
>That's fine.
>
>One other question: is it the case that review of the MPEG materials
>to ascertain any potential infringement obligates the reviewer
>to the terms and conditions of the patent holder? In other words,
>is tainting directly inferred by the review?
>
>len
>
>From: Robin Berjon [mailto:robin.berjon@expway.fr]
>
>Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
>> What if any impact will these patented techniques have
>> on the workshop outcomes other than to invoke the W3C IPR
>> policies wherever necessary?
>
>I'm unsure, do you mean will patents held on parts of MPEG-7 BiM be removed
>from
>BiM? The decision is not up to me but I doubt it. If, however, as a
>consequence
>of the workshop the W3C decides to pursue work in this area then obviously
>the
>W3C rules will be followed.
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
>initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
>The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
>manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
--
Rex Brooks
GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison, Berkeley, CA, 94702 USA, Earth
W3Address: http://www.starbourne.com
Email: rexb@starbourne.com
Tel: 510-849-2309
Fax: By Request
|
