xml-dev

← back

705 messages · 202 threads

# Subject From Date
00013 Re: [xml-dev] more politics Berend de Boer 2003-07-31 20:28
00049 Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema? james anderson 2003-07-31 22:32
00050 Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema? james anderson 2003-07-31 23:05
00020 Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema? james anderson 2003-07-31 23:08
00027 Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?) james anderson 2003-07-31 23:43
00047 RE: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?) Rick Marshall 2003-08-01 00:14
00026 Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?) james anderson 2003-08-01 00:15
00038 RE: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?) Rick Marshall 2003-08-01 00:17
00015 Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema? james anderson 2003-08-01 00:39
00032 Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?) james anderson 2003-08-01 01:14
00008 Re: [xml-dev] more politics Berend de Boer 2003-08-01 01:25
00006 Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?) james anderson 2003-08-01 01:40
00009 Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema? james anderson 2003-08-01 01:42
00002 Re: [xml-dev] Defining non-WXS datatypes james anderson 2003-08-01 01:44
00000 Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?) james anderson 2003-08-01 02:25
00035 Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?) Rick Marshall 2003-08-01 03:01
00029 Re: [xml-dev] [[email protected]: Returned mail: Host unknown (Name server: lists.org.xml: host not found)] John Cowan 2003-08-01 04:31
00004 Re: [xml-dev] Defining non-WXS datatypes Bob Foster 2003-08-01 05:47
00010 Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?) Simon St.Laurent 2003-08-01 06:22
00005 multiple schemas, annotations Simon St.Laurent 2003-08-01 06:43
00007 Re: [xml-dev] more politics Sean McGrath 2003-08-01 06:57
00041 XSL transformation clientside errors Ali Asghar Safri 2003-08-01 07:37
00044 Re: [xml-dev] Defining non-WXS datatypes james anderson 2003-08-01 08:06
00024 Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?) james anderson 2003-08-01 09:12
00016 Re: [xml-dev] multiple schemas, annotations Bill de hÓra 2003-08-01 10:06
00019 RE: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?) David Megginson 2003-08-01 11:40
00021 Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?) Thomas B. Passin 2003-08-01 12:56
00045 Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?) Simon St.Laurent 2003-08-01 13:32
00040 RE: [xml-dev] more politics Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-01 13:51
00048 RE: [xml-dev] How did "public identifier" get its name... Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-01 13:52
00037 Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?) Mitch Amiano 2003-08-01 14:21
00018 Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema? Chiusano Joseph 2003-08-01 15:19
00022 Re[2]: [xml-dev] DTDs: Teilite vs. Sdocbook [email protected] 2003-08-01 20:00
00046 Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?) james anderson 2003-08-02 11:08
00039 Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? Liam Quin 2003-08-02 23:52
00042 Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? Liam Quin 2003-08-03 00:04
00043 Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? Liam Quin 2003-08-03 00:34
00704 Xml to xml transformation Shailesh 2003-08-03 07:08
00023 Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? Alaric B Snell 2003-08-03 22:35
00017 Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? Liam Quin 2003-08-04 00:03
00025 A parentless element that is not the document node - how? Roger L. Costello 2003-08-04 12:28
00036 RE: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how? W. Hugh Chatfield I.S.P. 2003-08-04 14:16
00014 Re: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how? David Carlisle 2003-08-04 14:18
00028 Re: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how? David Carlisle 2003-08-04 14:31
00003 Re: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how? Betty Harvey 2003-08-04 14:33
00011 RE: [xml-dev] String interning (Was: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) Hunsberger, Peter 2003-08-04 15:54
00012 Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? Alaric B Snell 2003-08-04 16:10
00001 Number of name characters? Gustaf Liljegren 2003-08-04 18:26
00030 RE: [xml-dev] String interning (Was: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) Michael Kay 2003-08-04 18:31
00031 RE: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how? Michael Kay 2003-08-04 18:36
00033 Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? Liam Quin 2003-08-04 18:37
00103 Re: [xml-dev] String interning (Was: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) Chiusano Joseph 2003-08-04 18:43
00117 RE: [xml-dev] String interning (Was: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) Hunsberger, Peter 2003-08-04 18:44
00074 RE: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-04 18:44
00034 Re: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how? Bob Foster 2003-08-04 18:45
00059 Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? Rick Jelliffe 2003-08-04 19:16
00060 Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? Liam Quin 2003-08-04 19:30
00073 Re: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how? Betty Harvey 2003-08-04 19:38
00118 RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-04 19:56
00101 RE: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how? W. Hugh Chatfield I.S.P. 2003-08-04 20:10
00105 RE: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how? W. Hugh Chatfield I.S.P. 2003-08-04 20:33
00116 Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how?) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-04 20:34
00090 RE: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how?) W. Hugh Chatfield I.S.P. 2003-08-04 20:44
00078 RE: [xml-dev] Number of name characters? Jeff Lowery 2003-08-04 21:07
00138 RE: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-04 21:30
00148 Re: [xml-dev] Number of name characters? John Cowan 2003-08-04 21:43
00147 XMLURL problem! SETH,MANOJ (HP-India,ex2) 2003-08-04 21:44
00137 Re: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how? John Cowan 2003-08-04 21:45
00080 Re: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) John Cowan 2003-08-04 21:47
00076 RE: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-04 21:57
00089 Re: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how? Bob Foster 2003-08-04 22:10
00075 Re: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) Chiusano Joseph 2003-08-04 22:13
00093 RE: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-04 22:14
00091 Re: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) Bob Foster 2003-08-04 22:22
00149 Re: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) John Cowan 2003-08-05 00:07
00136 Re: [xml-dev] Number of name characters? John Cowan 2003-08-05 00:08
00135 RE: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how? W. Hugh Chatfield I.S.P. 2003-08-05 00:33
00150 RE: [xml-dev] Number of name characters? Jeff Lowery 2003-08-05 00:38
00092 Re: [xml-dev] Number of name characters? Tim Bray 2003-08-05 00:45
00077 Re: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) Rick Marshall 2003-08-05 00:54
00088 Schema Conversion [was A parentless element that is not the document node - how?] Betty Harvey 2003-08-05 02:17
00079 Re: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) Mitch Amiano 2003-08-05 04:32
00114 Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? Rick Jelliffe 2003-08-05 04:57
00106 Re: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) Bob Foster 2003-08-05 05:07
00061 Re: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) Bob Foster 2003-08-05 05:33
00072 RE: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-05 12:48
00071 Re: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) Chiusano Joseph 2003-08-05 12:57
00062 Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-05 13:14
00104 Re: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) Robin Berjon 2003-08-05 13:18
00115 RE: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-05 13:29
00102 RE: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-05 13:35
00119 RE: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-d ev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-05 13:51
00144 Re: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) Liam Quin 2003-08-05 13:51
00129 Re: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) Robin Berjon 2003-08-05 14:05
00081 RE: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-05 14:06
00098 RE: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-d ev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-05 14:39
00099 RE: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-d ev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) Rex Brooks 2003-08-05 15:26
00127 Re: new line handling (DOMBuilder and DOMSerializer) John Cowan 2003-08-05 15:27
00145 Re: [xml-dev] String interning (Was: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) Tyler Close 2003-08-05 15:53
00083 RE: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-d ev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) Rex Brooks 2003-08-05 16:13
00143 Re: [xml-dev] String interning (Was: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) Robin Berjon 2003-08-05 16:40
00132 Re: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) Mitch Amiano 2003-08-05 16:51
00056 Encoding URI's for xml validation Jerry Sheehan 2003-08-05 19:17
00065 Re: [xml-dev] Encoding URI's for xml validation John Cowan 2003-08-05 20:47
00121 RE: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-d ev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) Rick Marshall 2003-08-05 21:59
00113 RE: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) Alessandro Triglia 2003-08-06 00:09
00111 Re: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-d ev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) 'Liam Quin' 2003-08-06 01:18
00122 Re: [xml-dev] Encoding URI's for xml validation Richard Tobin 2003-08-06 02:04
00064 Re: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) Robin Berjon 2003-08-06 08:58
00058 RE: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-d ev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-06 14:24
00066 ANNOUNCE: VixX3D Beta Edtor Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-06 14:56
00053 RE: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-d ev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-06 15:12
00070 XML-XML Mapping John Gibby 2003-08-06 15:46
00051 Re: [xml-dev] XML-XML Mapping Chiusano Joseph 2003-08-06 17:01
00109 Re: [xml-dev] XML-XML Mapping Bob Foster 2003-08-06 19:18
00124 Re: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-d ev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) John Cowan 2003-08-06 22:01
00125 RTF to XML Conversion (Majix or otherwise) Jim Caprio 2003-08-06 23:33
00108 Re: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-d ev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) Bob Foster 2003-08-07 00:29
00055 Re: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-d ev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) John Cowan 2003-08-07 00:58
00067 rss 0.91 with rdf extension bryan 2003-08-07 08:38
00057 RE: [xml-dev] XML-XML Mapping Michael Kay 2003-08-07 08:43
00063 RE: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) Alessandro Triglia 2003-08-07 12:26
00133 Re: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) Robin Berjon 2003-08-07 13:09
00140 ANN: InferEd (RDF Editor w/ Inference) Beta2 Released Derrish Repchick 2003-08-07 15:00
00097 Re: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-dev]Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) Robin Berjon 2003-08-07 15:02
00084 Re: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) Tim Bray 2003-08-07 16:13
00087 What does RSS stand for? [email protected] 2003-08-07 18:55
00094 RE: [xml-dev] What does RSS stand for? Bedros Hanounik 2003-08-07 18:59
00141 RE: [xml-dev] What does RSS stand for? DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO) 2003-08-07 19:03
00131 RE: [xml-dev] What does RSS stand for? Jeff Lowery 2003-08-07 19:26
00146 Re: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) Claude Seyrat 2003-08-07 19:36
00128 RE: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-d ev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-07 19:59
00086 Re: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) Tim Bray 2003-08-07 20:10
00095 Re: [xml-dev] What does RSS stand for? Adam Turoff 2003-08-07 20:31
00142 Re: [xml-dev] What does RSS stand for? Joe English 2003-08-07 20:33
00130 Re: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-d ev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) Jim Ancona 2003-08-07 20:39
00134 RE: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-d ev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-07 21:01
00139 [ANN] Exchanger XML Editor 1.0 Released Edwin Dankert 2003-08-07 22:14
00096 Re: [xml-dev] What does RSS stand for? Ian Graham 2003-08-08 01:41
00085 RE: [xml-dev] rss 0.91 with rdf extension bryan 2003-08-08 07:47
00100 Re: [xml-dev] rss 0.91 with rdf extension Emmanuil Batsis (Manos) 2003-08-08 08:08
00082 RE: [xml-dev] rss 0.91 with rdf extension bryan 2003-08-08 08:44
00054 RE: [xml-dev] rss 0.91 with rdf extension bryan 2003-08-08 09:14
00126 Re: [xml-dev] rss 0.91 with rdf extension Emmanuil Batsis (Manos) 2003-08-08 09:18
00107 Re: [xml-dev] [ANN] Exchanger XML Editor 1.0 Released Emmanuil Batsis (Manos) 2003-08-08 09:21
00068 Re: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) Claude Seyrat 2003-08-08 09:26
00052 RE: [xml-dev] Looking for a schema->html form XSL transform Klotz, Leigh 2003-08-08 20:22
00110 Determining version of MSXML in use Micah Dubinko 2003-08-08 20:50
00123 RE: [xml-dev] Looking for a schema->html form XSL transform [email protected] 2003-08-08 20:59
00069 Looking for a schema->html form XSL transform Cameron Shorter 2003-08-08 21:01
00112 RE: [xml-dev] Determining version of MSXML in use Robert Koberg 2003-08-08 21:19
00120 Re: [xml-dev] What does RSS stand for? John Cowan 2003-08-08 22:01
00203 RE: [xml-dev] Looking for a schema->html form XSL transform Klotz, Leigh 2003-08-08 22:50
00217 RE: [xml-dev] Looking for a schema->html form XSL transform [email protected] 2003-08-08 22:59
00174 Re: [xml-dev] Looking for a schema->html form XSL transform Jeff Greif 2003-08-08 23:06
00159 RE: [xml-dev] Looking for a schema->html form XSL transform Klotz, Leigh 2003-08-08 23:49
00160 RE: [xml-dev] Determining version of MSXML in use Micah Dubinko 2003-08-09 00:13
00173 Re: [xml-dev] Looking for a schema->html form XSL transform Bob Foster 2003-08-09 01:31
00218 Re: [xml-dev] tool to generate one standalone DTD from multiple module DTD Elliotte Rusty Harold 2003-08-09 11:14
00201 Random thoughts on reflection Eric van der Vlist 2003-08-09 18:53
00216 re: [xml-dev] Random thoughts on reflection David Megginson 2003-08-09 20:15
00205 re: [xml-dev] Random thoughts on reflection Eric van der Vlist 2003-08-09 20:40
00190 re: [xml-dev] Random thoughts on reflection Simon St.Laurent 2003-08-09 21:12
00178 re: [xml-dev] Random thoughts on reflection Eric van der Vlist 2003-08-09 21:36
00247 Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema? Thomas B. Passin 2003-08-10 01:52
00238 Oasis website down? Bob Foster 2003-08-10 01:52
00248 Re: [xml-dev] Encoding URI's for xml validation Thomas B. Passin 2003-08-10 02:25
00180 Re: [xml-dev] Encoding URI's for xml validation John Cowan 2003-08-10 03:16
00237 Re: [xml-dev] Encoding URI's for xml validation Thomas B. Passin 2003-08-10 03:58
00189 Re: [xml-dev] Oasis website down? [email protected] 2003-08-10 08:15
00176 Re: [xml-dev] Oasis website down? Andy Greener 2003-08-10 08:26
00191 ANN: Enhancing Data Interoperability with Ontologies, Canonical Forms, and Include Files Roger L. Costello 2003-08-10 14:18
00175 RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? Elliotte Rusty Harold 2003-08-10 17:37
00193 Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? Elliotte Rusty Harold 2003-08-10 19:09
00249 Re: [ANN] Exchanger XML Editor 1.0 Released Edwin Dankert 2003-08-10 19:16
00236 Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? Dennis Sosnoski 2003-08-10 20:13
00235 graphs and trees Simon St.Laurent 2003-08-10 21:55
00250 Re: [xml-dev] graphs and trees Thomas B. Passin 2003-08-10 23:32
00192 Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? John Cowan 2003-08-11 01:36
00177 Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? Dennis Sosnoski 2003-08-11 02:09
00188 Re: [xml-dev] Random thoughts on reflection Robin Berjon 2003-08-11 08:20
00179 Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? Robin Berjon 2003-08-11 09:06
00214 Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? Robin Berjon 2003-08-11 09:55
00206 ANN: Syntext Serna Beta Release: XSL-on-the-fly WYSIWYG XML Editor [email protected] 2003-08-11 14:23
00161 Web Services and URIs Chiusano Joseph 2003-08-11 14:34
00172 RE: [xml-dev] Looking for a schema->html form XSL transform Klotz, Leigh 2003-08-11 17:58
00171 Automated ASCII to XML converter Donald Traboini 2003-08-11 20:55
00162 Re: [xml-dev] Automated ASCII to XML converter Rick Marshall 2003-08-11 22:14
00204 RE: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how? Cox, Bruce 2003-08-11 22:47
00215 Re: [xml-dev] Automated ASCII to XML converter Bryce K. Nielsen 2003-08-11 23:39
00202 Ambiguities in section 4.3.2 of XML 1.0 SE Perry A. Caro 2003-08-12 00:02
00219 Re: [xml-dev] Ambiguities in section 4.3.2 of XML 1.0 SE John Cowan 2003-08-12 00:46
00244 Re: [xml-dev] Ambiguities in section 4.3.2 of XML 1.0 SE Perry A. Caro 2003-08-12 01:19
00181 Re: [xml-dev] Automated ASCII to XML converter Rohit Mital 2003-08-12 14:30
00229 ANN: eXist native XML database 0.9.2 Wolfgang Meier 2003-08-12 15:56
00199 RE: [xml-dev] Ambiguities in section 4.3.2 of XML 1.0 SE Derek Denny-Brown 2003-08-12 16:35
00198 Re: [xml-dev] Ambiguities in section 4.3.2 of XML 1.0 SE Richard Tobin 2003-08-12 16:47
00183 Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-12 20:23
00227 Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? Simon St.Laurent 2003-08-12 20:50
00245 RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? Dare Obasanjo 2003-08-12 21:19
00232 RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-12 21:30
00243 RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? Dare Obasanjo 2003-08-12 21:45
00165 RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? Dare Obasanjo 2003-08-12 22:16
00156 Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? Bob Foster 2003-08-12 22:25
00221 Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? Chiusano Joseph 2003-08-12 22:32
00213 Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? John Cowan 2003-08-12 22:34
00211 RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? Dare Obasanjo 2003-08-12 22:50
00222 RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? Dare Obasanjo 2003-08-12 22:55
00164 Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? Chiusano Joseph 2003-08-12 23:01
00158 Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? Jonathan Borden 2003-08-12 23:38
00166 RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? Dare Obasanjo 2003-08-13 00:38
00153 RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? Simon St.Laurent 2003-08-13 01:34
00170 RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? Dare Obasanjo 2003-08-13 01:36
00151 Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? Thomas B. Passin 2003-08-13 01:58
00209 Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? Alaric B Snell 2003-08-13 12:59
00224 Adding standalone Bhargav Bharath 2003-08-13 13:37
00225 RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-13 14:16
00208 Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? Jonathan Borden 2003-08-13 14:18
00155 Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? Chiusano Joseph 2003-08-13 14:31
00167 RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? Simon St.Laurent 2003-08-13 14:38
00157 Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? Jonathan Borden 2003-08-13 14:43
00163 Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? Chiusano Joseph 2003-08-13 14:51
00233 Re: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL Elliotte Rusty Harold 2003-08-13 14:51
00240 RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? Dare Obasanjo 2003-08-13 14:59
00197 Re: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL Chiusano Joseph 2003-08-13 15:07
00184 RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-13 15:10
00187 Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? Jonathan Borden 2003-08-13 15:30
00194 RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? Simon St.Laurent 2003-08-13 15:35
00241 embedding RDF in XHTML Simon St.Laurent 2003-08-13 15:50
00231 RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-13 16:08
00246 RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? Simon St.Laurent 2003-08-13 16:15
00228 Silly indemnity FUD Uche Ogbuji 2003-08-13 17:31
00186 RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-13 17:51
00195 RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Silly indemnity FUD) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-13 18:03
00242 RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? Dare Obasanjo 2003-08-13 18:25
00230 RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-13 18:37
00234 Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? Alaric B Snell 2003-08-13 19:00
00196 Re: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL Elliotte Rusty Harold 2003-08-13 19:41
00239 Escaping XML? Flattening the parse tree? reinhard gantar 2003-08-13 19:42
00200 Re: Silly indemnity FUD Uche Ogbuji 2003-08-13 19:56
00185 Data vs. Document-Oriented XML - Better Terms? (Was Re: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL) Chiusano Joseph 2003-08-13 20:17
00182 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Silly indemnity FUD Chiusano Joseph 2003-08-13 20:26
00226 RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? [email protected] 2003-08-13 20:29
00207 RE: [xml-dev] Re: Silly indemnity FUD Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-13 20:34
00154 RE: [xml-dev] Re: Silly indemnity FUD Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-13 20:35
00168 RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? Elliotte Rusty Harold 2003-08-13 20:37
00169 Re: [xml-dev] Escaping XML? Flattening the parse tree? Elliotte Rusty Harold 2003-08-13 20:43
00210 RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-13 20:57
00152 Re: [xml-dev] Data vs. Document-Oriented XML - Better Terms? (Was Re: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL) Bob Foster 2003-08-13 21:03
00223 RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-13 21:09
00212 RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? Dare Obasanjo 2003-08-13 21:11
00220 Re: [xml-dev] Escaping XML? Flattening the parse tree? Rick Marshall 2003-08-13 21:13
00303 RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? Cox, Bruce 2003-08-13 21:29
00317 Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? John Cowan 2003-08-13 21:47
00274 RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? Rick Marshall 2003-08-13 21:52
00259 Adding standalone="yes" to XML document Bhargav Bharath 2003-08-14 04:03
00260 XACML adding new functions [email protected] 2003-08-14 07:08
00273 Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? Alaric B Snell 2003-08-14 07:22
00318 RE: [xml-dev] Re: Silly indemnity FUD [email protected] 2003-08-14 09:13
00316 RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? Elliotte Rusty Harold 2003-08-14 13:06
00301 Re: [xml-dev] XACML adding new functions Chiusano Joseph 2003-08-14 13:11
00305 RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-14 13:40
00290 RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-14 14:01
00278 RE: [xml-dev] Re: Silly indemnity FUD Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-14 14:08
00347 Re: [xml-dev] XACML adding new functions Chiusano Joseph 2003-08-14 14:22
00338 Re: [xml-dev] XACML adding new functions Mitch Amiano 2003-08-14 14:30
00337 RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? Elliotte Rusty Harold 2003-08-14 15:05
00348 RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? Hunsberger, Peter 2003-08-14 15:06
00280 SMIL markup Simon St.Laurent 2003-08-14 15:18
00289 RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-14 15:26
00276 RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? Dare Obasanjo 2003-08-14 15:57
00291 Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? james anderson 2003-08-14 16:08
00275 Re: [xml-dev] Adding standalone="yes" to XML document Uche Ogbuji 2003-08-14 16:12
00349 RE: [xml-dev] Adding standalone="yes" to XML document Dare Obasanjo 2003-08-14 16:25
00293 Re: [xml-dev] Adding standalone="yes" to XML document Robin Berjon 2003-08-14 16:26
00336 RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-14 16:41
00335 [ANN] <oXygen/> XML Editor 2.0.3 George Cristian Bina 2003-08-14 17:18
00350 Re: [xml-dev] Adding standalone="yes" to XML document Uche Ogbuji 2003-08-14 17:26
00292 Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? james anderson 2003-08-14 17:46
00277 Java SAX tools (was: Re: [xml-dev] Adding standalone="yes" to XML document) Robin Berjon 2003-08-14 17:54
00288 RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-14 18:17
00279 Paypal Rich Salz 2003-08-14 18:24
00314 RE: [xml-dev] Paypal Dare Obasanjo 2003-08-14 18:29
00306 Re: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL Makoto Yui 2003-08-14 18:34
00261 RE: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL Doug Rudder 2003-08-14 19:15
00272 RE: [xml-dev] Paypal Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-14 19:16
00262 RE: [xml-dev] Paypal Dare Obasanjo 2003-08-14 19:27
00271 Re: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL Chiusano Joseph 2003-08-14 19:28
00304 RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Paypal)) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-14 19:45
00315 Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? Bill de hÓra 2003-08-14 19:54
00302 Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? Bill de hÓra 2003-08-14 19:58
00257 Re: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL Elliotte Rusty Harold 2003-08-14 20:00
00319 Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? Bill de hÓra 2003-08-14 20:01
00344 Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? John Cowan 2003-08-14 20:06
00329 RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-14 20:10
00281 Help with Schema Wilson David 2003-08-14 22:47
00299 Re: [xml-dev] Help with Schema Chiusano Joseph 2003-08-14 23:06
00298 Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? Bill de hÓra 2003-08-14 23:08
00283 Python/XML parsing Donald Traboini 2003-08-15 00:12
00327 Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? Rich Salz 2003-08-15 01:26
00345 Re: [xml-dev] Python/XML parsing Thomas B. Passin 2003-08-15 03:06
00332 Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? B. Tommie Usdin 2003-08-15 03:55
00343 Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? james anderson 2003-08-15 07:20
00256 Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? james anderson 2003-08-15 08:32
00265 thinking about "namespace pedantry" james anderson 2003-08-15 11:30
00321 Wiki SVG whiteboard Bill de hÓra 2003-08-15 12:10
00313 Re: [xml-dev] Python/XML parsing Uche Ogbuji 2003-08-15 12:32
00322 RE: [xml-dev] Wiki SVG whiteboard bryan 2003-08-15 13:13
00311 Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Paypal)) Daniel Veillard 2003-08-15 13:15
00264 RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Paypal)) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-15 13:48
00258 RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO) 2003-08-15 13:54
00266 RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-15 14:14
00253 Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? Bill de hÓra 2003-08-15 14:23
00270 RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-15 14:27
00251 Re: [xml-dev] Java SAX tools (was: Re: [xml-dev] Adding standalone="yes" to XML document) Jeff Rafter 2003-08-15 15:30
00309 RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-15 16:48
00324 RE: [xml-dev] thinking about "namespace pedantry" Michael Kay 2003-08-15 17:36
00325 RE: [xml-dev] Java SAX tools (was: Re: [xml-dev] Adding standalone="yes" to XML document) Paul Brown 2003-08-15 17:52
00308 Re: [xml-dev] thinking about "namespace pedantry" Jonathan Borden 2003-08-15 19:56
00255 The State of the XUL Union Gerald Bauer 2003-08-15 19:59
00267 Re: [xml-dev] thinking about "namespace pedantry" Joe English 2003-08-15 21:13
00263 Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? John Cowan 2003-08-16 02:48
00333 Xerces-C to parse DocBook xml xml tom 2003-08-16 03:37
00340 Xerces-C to parse DocBook xml xml tom 2003-08-16 03:37
00297 Xerces-C to parse DocBook xml xml tom 2003-08-16 03:37
00284 Re: [xml-dev] Xerces-C to parse DocBook xml Mitch Amiano 2003-08-16 04:38
00287 Re: [xml-dev] Xerces-C to parse DocBook xml xml tom 2003-08-16 09:10
00294 Announcement: XML Acronym Demystifier Mario Jeckle 2003-08-17 13:21
00331 DocBook XML - Validating D Tom 2003-08-18 09:54
00346 Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? Elliotte Rusty Harold 2003-08-18 11:02
00328 Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? Robin Berjon 2003-08-18 11:46
00286 Re: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL Chiusano Joseph 2003-08-18 13:24
00295 Federal Court says Microsoft infringed UC, Eolas Web Objects Patent Jonathan Robie 2003-08-18 13:47
00342 RE: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL Doug Rudder 2003-08-18 14:03
00330 Re: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL Chiusano Joseph 2003-08-18 14:10
00334 Re: [xml-dev] Federal Court says Microsoft infringed UC, Eolas Web Objects Patent Robin Berjon 2003-08-18 14:12
00339 Re: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL Elliotte Rusty Harold 2003-08-18 14:14
00296 RE: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL Doug Rudder 2003-08-18 14:20
00285 Re: [xml-dev] Federal Court says Microsoft infringed UC, Eolas Web Objects P... [email protected] 2003-08-18 14:24
00300 RE: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL Doug Rudder 2003-08-18 14:36
00282 "Types" of XML (Was Re: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL) Chiusano Joseph 2003-08-18 14:39
00326 Re: [xml-dev] Federal Court says Microsoft infringed UC, Eolas Web Objects P... Robin Berjon 2003-08-18 14:44
00307 question on XQuery -> SQL translators Murali Mani 2003-08-18 14:54
00254 Re: [xml-dev] question on XQuery -> SQL translators Mark R Maxey 2003-08-18 15:33
00268 A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? Roger L. Costello 2003-08-18 16:34
00341 Parsing XML Manik 2003-08-18 16:39
00269 Re: [xml-dev] question on XQuery -> SQL translators Makoto Yui 2003-08-18 16:39
00252 Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? Chiusano Joseph 2003-08-18 16:53
00323 RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? W. Hugh Chatfield I.S.P. 2003-08-18 17:32
00310 RelaxNG question Tim Bray 2003-08-18 17:45
00312 RE: [xml-dev] tool to generate one standalone DTD from multiple module DTD Roche, Conrad (Cognizant) 2003-08-18 17:59
00320 [Fwd: [cam] Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing togetherreusable XML fragments in prose?] Chiusano Joseph 2003-08-18 18:36
00403 The XML Acronym Demystifier Michael Wilson 2003-08-18 19:07
00417 Re: [xml-dev] The XML Acronym Demystifier Chiusano Joseph 2003-08-18 19:15
00374 Re: [xml-dev] The XML Acronym Demystifier Chiusano Joseph 2003-08-18 19:35
00359 RE: [xml-dev] question on XQuery -> SQL translators Dare Obasanjo 2003-08-18 19:35
00360 Re: [xml-dev] RelaxNG question Bill de hÓra 2003-08-18 21:17
00373 RE: [xml-dev] RelaxNG question Dare Obasanjo 2003-08-18 21:26
00418 Re: [xml-dev] XACML adding new functions Seth Proctor 2003-08-18 21:42
00401 Re: [xml-dev] RelaxNG question Bill de hÓra 2003-08-18 21:53
00416 RE: [xml-dev] RelaxNG question Dare Obasanjo 2003-08-18 21:55
00405 Re: [xml-dev] RelaxNG question Bill de hÓra 2003-08-18 22:12
00390 RE: [xml-dev] RelaxNG question Dare Obasanjo 2003-08-18 22:21
00378 RE: [xml-dev] RelaxNG question Simon St.Laurent 2003-08-18 22:32
00438 Re: [xml-dev] RelaxNG question Tim Bray 2003-08-18 22:36
00447 Re: [xml-dev] Federal Court says Microsoft infringed UC, Eolas Web Objects P... John Cowan 2003-08-18 22:41
00448 RE: [xml-dev] RelaxNG question Dare Obasanjo 2003-08-18 22:45
00380 RE: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL Rick Marshall 2003-08-18 22:53
00437 Re: [xml-dev] RelaxNG question Bill de hÓra 2003-08-18 22:54
00389 Re: [xml-dev] "Types" of XML (Was Re: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL) Rick Marshall 2003-08-18 22:55
00376 Re: [xml-dev] RelaxNG question Jonathan Borden 2003-08-18 22:59
00391 Re: [xml-dev] Federal Court says Microsoft infringed UC, Eolas Web Objects P... Rick Marshall 2003-08-18 23:01
00375 Re: [xml-dev] RelaxNG question Jonathan Borden 2003-08-18 23:06
00393 Re: [xml-dev] Federal Court says Microsoft infringed UC, Eolas Web Objects P... Jonathan Borden 2003-08-18 23:25
00449 Re: [xml-dev] RelaxNG question Bill de hÓra 2003-08-18 23:28
00436 Re: [xml-dev] RelaxNG question Bill de hÓra 2003-08-18 23:41
00435 Re: [xml-dev] RelaxNG question Simon St.Laurent 2003-08-18 23:58
00450 The need for a formal description Gustaf Liljegren 2003-08-19 00:01
00392 Re: [xml-dev] RelaxNG question Jonathan Borden 2003-08-19 00:10
00377 Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? Mitch Amiano 2003-08-19 02:28
00388 Re: [xml-dev] RelaxNG question James Clark 2003-08-19 03:00
00379 Re: [xml-dev] Federal Court says Microsoft infringed UC, Eolas Web Objects P... Robin Berjon 2003-08-19 08:42
00414 RE: [xml-dev] Federal Court says Microsoft infringed UC, Eolas Web Objects P... bryan 2003-08-19 08:59
00406 Re: [xml-dev] Federal Court says Microsoft infringed UC, Eolas Web Objects P... Robin Berjon 2003-08-19 10:13
00361 Re: [xml-dev] RelaxNG question Dave Beckett 2003-08-19 11:25
00372 RE: [xml-dev] RelaxNG question Sean McGrath 2003-08-19 11:42
00371 RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? Nordström Ari 2003-08-19 11:56
00443 Re: [xml-dev] "Types" of XML (Was Re: [xml-dev] XML databaseenviroment using PostgreSQL) Chiusano Joseph 2003-08-19 12:38
00362 RE: [xml-dev] Federal Court says Microsoft infringed UC, Eolas We b Objects Patent Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-19 13:39
00404 What's the delay with XSLT/XPath 2.0? Roger L. Costello 2003-08-19 13:49
00415 Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? Liam Quin 2003-08-19 15:31
00419 Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? dbexcom 2003-08-19 15:47
00402 RE: [xml-dev] What's the delay with XSLT/XPath 2.0? Michael Kay 2003-08-19 15:56
00444 Re: [xml-dev] RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? Chiusano Joseph 2003-08-19 16:12
00429 Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? Sai Surya Kiran Evani 2003-08-19 16:49
00381 Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? [email protected] 2003-08-19 17:04
00399 Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? Mitch Amiano 2003-08-19 19:06
00398 RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-19 19:14
00383 Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? Scott Parnell 2003-08-19 19:21
00427 RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) Jeff Lowery 2003-08-19 19:28
00445 Re: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) Tim Bray 2003-08-19 20:02
00432 Question regarding DSD Murali Mani 2003-08-19 20:11
00356 RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) Jeff Lowery 2003-08-19 20:13
00365 Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? pop3 2003-08-19 20:14
00421 RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) Jeff Lowery 2003-08-19 20:29
00413 Re: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) Norman Walsh 2003-08-19 20:38
00411 Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? dbexlist 2003-08-19 20:48
00422 RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) Simon St.Laurent 2003-08-19 20:56
00364 Postel's Law Has No Exceptions Simon St.Laurent 2003-08-19 21:02
00358 RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) Jeff Lowery 2003-08-19 21:06
00366 RE: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-19 21:18
00353 Re: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions Jonathan Robie 2003-08-19 21:24
00370 RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) Jeff Lowery 2003-08-19 21:31
00351 Re: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) Norman Walsh 2003-08-19 21:58
00409 Re: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) Norman Walsh 2003-08-19 22:00
00424 RE: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions Dare Obasanjo 2003-08-19 22:02
00425 RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) Jeff Lowery 2003-08-19 22:06
00408 Re: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions Simon St.Laurent 2003-08-19 22:19
00355 RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) Jeff Lowery 2003-08-19 22:22
00367 RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable X ML fragments in prose? [email protected] 2003-08-19 22:26
00357 Re: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions Tim Bray 2003-08-19 22:31
00363 RE: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions Joshua Allen 2003-08-19 22:38
00433 Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? Rick Marshall 2003-08-19 22:48
00440 RE: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions Julian Reschke 2003-08-19 23:02
00397 Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? Chiusano Joseph 2003-08-19 23:08
00384 Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? Rick Marshall 2003-08-19 23:25
00387 RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? Alessandro Triglia 2003-08-19 23:52
00394 Re: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) james anderson 2003-08-20 05:24
00431 Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? Michael Fuller 2003-08-20 07:44
00441 Re: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions Miles Sabin 2003-08-20 08:41
00446 CFP: XML Database Symposium (XSym03) @ VLDB 2003 akmal chaudhri 2003-08-20 08:48
00428 RE: [xml-dev] RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? Nordström Ari 2003-08-20 10:54
00386 XSLT 2.0 Processor = XSLT Processor + W3 XML Schema Validator Roger L. Costello 2003-08-20 11:02
00395 Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? dbexcom 2003-08-20 11:16
00430 Re: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question) Chiusano Joseph 2003-08-20 12:36
00385 Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? Chiusano Joseph 2003-08-20 12:40
00442 Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 Processor = XSLT Processor + W3 XML Schema Validator Jeni Tennison 2003-08-20 12:40
00400 Re: [xml-dev] RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? Chiusano Joseph 2003-08-20 12:45
00434 Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? Chiusano Joseph 2003-08-20 12:52
00439 RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable X ML fragments in prose? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-20 13:45
00396 RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-20 13:45
00382 RE: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-20 14:20
00426 Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? Rick Marshall 2003-08-20 14:46
00354 RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? Rick Marshall 2003-08-20 15:08
00407 RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? Dare Obasanjo 2003-08-20 15:09
00368 Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? Mike Champion 2003-08-20 15:30
00369 Re: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions Jonathan Borden 2003-08-20 15:45
00352 Re: [xml-dev] RelaxNG question rjelliffe 2003-08-20 16:05
00423 RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? Dare Obasanjo 2003-08-20 16:06
00410 RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) Jeff Lowery 2003-08-20 16:46
00412 opposite of infoset Simon St.Laurent 2003-08-20 16:56
00420 RE: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions Joshua Allen 2003-08-20 17:11
00503 RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) Jeff Lowery 2003-08-20 17:12
00517 Re: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset Robin Berjon 2003-08-20 17:13
00474 RE: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset Chris Wilper 2003-08-20 17:17
00460 RE: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions Julian Reschke 2003-08-20 17:24
00459 Re: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset Jeff Rafter 2003-08-20 17:25
00473 Re: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset Simon St.Laurent 2003-08-20 17:26
00501 Re: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset Karl Waclawek 2003-08-20 17:30
00516 RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-20 17:31
00505 RE: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-20 17:42
00490 RE: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions Hunsberger, Peter 2003-08-20 17:45
00518 Re: opposite of infoset Dimitre Novatchev 2003-08-20 17:45
00478 Re: [xml-dev] Re: opposite of infoset Simon St.Laurent 2003-08-20 17:45
00538 RE: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions Joshua Allen 2003-08-20 17:46
00547 Re: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) james anderson 2003-08-20 18:13
00548 RE: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions Julian Reschke 2003-08-20 18:15
00537 RE: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions Julian Reschke 2003-08-20 18:21
00480 Re: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset Liam Quin 2003-08-20 19:11
00489 Re: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset Bob Foster 2003-08-20 19:44
00476 RSS for RSS? Jeff Rafter 2003-08-20 19:54
00491 Re: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset Simon St.Laurent 2003-08-20 20:41
00475 Re: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset Thomas B. Passin 2003-08-20 20:48
00493 RE: [xml-dev] Re: opposite of infoset Dare Obasanjo 2003-08-20 20:50
00519 Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? Chiusano Joseph 2003-08-20 21:05
00549 RE: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset Michael Kay 2003-08-20 21:11
00535 Re: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset Tim Bray 2003-08-20 21:16
00536 Re: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset Bob Foster 2003-08-20 21:22
00492 Re: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question) Chiusano Joseph 2003-08-20 21:25
00479 RE: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions Danny Ayers 2003-08-20 22:29
00550 RE: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset Michael Kay 2003-08-20 22:30
00477 RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable X ML fragments in prose? [email protected] 2003-08-20 22:30
00488 RE: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset Michael Kay 2003-08-20 22:34
00514 RE: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset Danny Ayers 2003-08-20 22:50
00506 Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? Michael Fuller 2003-08-20 23:15
00472 Re: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset Thomas B. Passin 2003-08-20 23:37
00461 Re: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset Bob Foster 2003-08-20 23:39
00471 Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? Tim Bray 2003-08-20 23:48
00462 RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) Jeff Lowery 2003-08-21 00:24
00504 Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? Rick Marshall 2003-08-21 00:30
00515 Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? Rick Marshall 2003-08-21 00:34
00502 Re: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset John Cowan 2003-08-21 01:06
00544 Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? Rick Marshall 2003-08-21 01:23
00529 Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? John Cowan 2003-08-21 01:42
00481 Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? Chiusano Joseph 2003-08-21 02:50
00499 Why does MSXML ignore encoding clause? Alexey Chub 2003-08-21 07:13
00498 RE: [xml-dev] Why does MSXML ignore encoding clause? Eckenberger Axel 2003-08-21 07:25
00483 [ANN] XML Standards Library 2.0 : Updated 2003-08-21 Tech Support 2003-08-21 08:41
00527 RE: [xml-dev] RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? Nordström Ari 2003-08-21 08:56
00545 Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? Daniel Veillard 2003-08-21 09:34
00525 RE: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions Elliotte Rusty Harold 2003-08-21 10:18
00532 ANN: Syntext Dtd2Xs v1.3 - Complex&Modularized XML DTD to XML Schema Converter [email protected] 2003-08-21 10:33
00543 Schema validators Morcom, Harvey 2003-08-21 12:13
00456 RE: [xml-dev] Schema validators Dare Obasanjo 2003-08-21 12:52
00465 Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? John Cowan 2003-08-21 13:02
00521 InkML Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-21 13:32
00513 RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-21 13:35
00511 Re: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question) Chiusano Joseph 2003-08-21 13:38
00522 Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? Tim Bray 2003-08-21 13:43
00464 Re: [xml-dev] InkML Simon St.Laurent 2003-08-21 13:48
00458 Re: [xml-dev] InkML Simon St.Laurent 2003-08-21 13:53
00466 RE: [xml-dev] InkML Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-21 14:10
00453 RE: [xml-dev] InkML Simon St.Laurent 2003-08-21 14:22
00470 RE: [xml-dev] InkML Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-21 14:38
00451 RE: [xml-dev] InkML Simon St.Laurent 2003-08-21 14:49
00509 RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable X ML fragments in prose? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-21 14:51
00524 RE: [xml-dev] InkML Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-21 15:42
00508 RE: [xml-dev] InkML Simon St.Laurent 2003-08-21 15:54
00455 RE: [xml-dev] InkML Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-21 16:08
00467 RE: [xml-dev] InkML Simon St.Laurent 2003-08-21 16:14
00457 RE: [xml-dev] InkML Hunsberger, Peter 2003-08-21 16:15
00533 RE: [xml-dev] InkML Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-21 16:36
00540 Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? Robin Berjon 2003-08-21 16:40
00497 RE: [xml-dev] InkML Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-21 16:49
00484 RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) Jeff Lowery 2003-08-21 16:53
00494 RE: [xml-dev] InkML Simon St.Laurent 2003-08-21 16:57
00487 Re: [xml-dev] InkML Chiusano Joseph 2003-08-21 16:57
00541 RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) Jeff Lowery 2003-08-21 16:59
00531 Re: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question) Chiusano Joseph 2003-08-21 17:00
00546 Re: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question) Chiusano Joseph 2003-08-21 17:09
00528 RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) Jeff Lowery 2003-08-21 17:30
00486 Re: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question) Chiusano Joseph 2003-08-21 17:34
00495 RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) Jeff Lowery 2003-08-21 17:50
00542 RE: [xml-dev] InkML Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-21 18:31
00530 RE: [xml-dev] InkML Simon St.Laurent 2003-08-21 18:40
00534 Re: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question) Chiusano Joseph 2003-08-21 18:46
00539 RE: [xml-dev] InkML Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-21 19:21
00496 RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) Jeff Lowery 2003-08-21 19:28
00485 Re: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question) Chiusano Joseph 2003-08-21 19:33
00500 RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) Jeff Lowery 2003-08-21 19:47
00482 Re: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question) Chiusano Joseph 2003-08-21 19:52
00526 RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) Jeff Lowery 2003-08-21 20:11
00507 Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? Daniel Veillard 2003-08-21 20:42
00454 RE: [xml-dev] InkML Simon St.Laurent 2003-08-21 20:55
00468 Re: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question) Chiusano Joseph 2003-08-21 22:40
00469 RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) Rick Marshall 2003-08-21 22:46
00452 Open Letter to Web Services, Semantics, Semantic Web and Ontology Communities john hardin 2003-08-21 22:56
00510 RE: [xml-dev] Beauty is in the eye of the beholder (was: Are we r eady...) Jeff Lowery 2003-08-21 23:09
00523 RE: [xml-dev] Beauty is in the eye of the beholder (was: Are we r eady...) Rick Marshall 2003-08-21 23:20
00512 RE: [xml-dev] Overlapping namespaces (was: Are we ready ...) Jeff Lowery 2003-08-21 23:33
00520 RE: [xml-dev] Beauty is in the eye of the beholder (was: Are we r eady...) Jeff Lowery 2003-08-21 23:51
00463 Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? Stephen D. Williams 2003-08-22 16:21
00603 RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose? Chris Angus 2003-08-26 15:11
00617 Synopsis - An Open Letter to john hardin 2003-08-26 15:20
00574 PHIL: Why The Web is Mediocre (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standar d approach to glueing together reusab leXML fragments in prose?) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-26 15:26
00559 Re: [xml-dev] Billions and billions? Mike Champion 2003-08-26 15:28
00560 RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose? Rick Marshall 2003-08-26 15:32
00573 RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose? Murali Mani 2003-08-26 15:51
00618 Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? Mitch Amiano 2003-08-26 15:52
00601 XPath brain teaser Roger L. Costello 2003-08-26 16:46
00576 RE: [xml-dev] XPath brain teaser Dare Obasanjo 2003-08-26 16:58
00616 Re: [xml-dev] XPath brain teaser David Carlisle 2003-08-26 17:00
00605 Re: [xml-dev] XPath brain teaser Jonathan Robie 2003-08-26 17:09
00578 RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose? Chris Angus 2003-08-26 17:13
00590 Re: [xml-dev] XPath brain teaser David Carlisle 2003-08-26 17:17
00638 RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableX ML fragments in prose? Jeff Lowery 2003-08-26 17:27
00647 Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model Mike Champion 2003-08-26 17:37
00648 RE: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model Jeff Lowery 2003-08-26 17:48
00580 [ANNOUNCE] WYSIWYG XSL website editor .. John Eadie 2003-08-26 17:57
00637 Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model Frank 2003-08-26 17:59
00589 Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model Frank 2003-08-26 18:14
00591 RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableX ML fragments in prose? Jeff Lowery 2003-08-26 18:41
00575 Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? Chiusano Joseph 2003-08-26 18:46
00593 Mondial: The CIA World Factbook in Oracle, XML, F-Logic, and Datalog Jonathan Robie 2003-08-26 19:18
00649 XML.Net find node by content and change attribute Mattison 2003-08-26 20:01
00636 Georgia State University Electronic Court Filing Project -- Lesson Learned III Winchel "Todd" Vincent III 2003-08-26 20:09
00635 Re: [xml-dev] Georgia State University Electronic Court Filing Project -- Lesson Learned III Chiusano Joseph 2003-08-26 20:17
00650 Re: [xml-dev] Georgia State University Electronic Court Filing Project -- Lesson Learned III Winchel "Todd" Vincent III 2003-08-26 20:32
00592 RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableX ML fragments in prose? Rick Marshall 2003-08-26 21:35
00577 RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose? Rick Marshall 2003-08-26 21:42
00579 Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model Berend de Boer 2003-08-26 22:03
00588 Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model Bob Foster 2003-08-26 22:04
00561 Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) pop3 2003-08-26 22:40
00572 RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? pop3 2003-08-26 22:41
00614 Re: [xml-dev] XPath brain teaser Bob Foster 2003-08-26 22:41
00606 Re: [xml-dev] XPath brain teaser Bob Foster 2003-08-26 22:50
00615 Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) pop3 2003-08-26 23:22
00619 Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? pop3 2003-08-26 23:27
00629 Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? pop3 2003-08-26 23:48
00602 Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? pop3 2003-08-26 23:50
00644 RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? pop3 2003-08-26 23:51
00562 Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model dbexlist 2003-08-26 23:53
00604 RE: [xml-dev] Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standar d approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? dbexlist 2003-08-26 23:54
00581 Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? pop3 2003-08-26 23:55
00571 Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model Bob Foster 2003-08-26 23:57
00599 Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? Bob Foster 2003-08-27 00:46
00598 Re: [xml-dev] XPath brain teaser Richard Tobin 2003-08-27 00:56
00583 Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? Simon St.Laurent 2003-08-27 01:09
00627 Re: [xml-dev] XPath brain teaser Bob Foster 2003-08-27 01:26
00645 Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? Mitch Amiano 2003-08-27 01:46
00632 RE: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? Didier PH Martin 2003-08-27 01:46
00643 Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev]A standard approach to glueing together ...) Chiusano Joseph 2003-08-27 01:55
00556 Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) Thomas B. Passin 2003-08-27 03:07
00565 Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? Thomas B. Passin 2003-08-27 03:11
00621 Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? Thomas B. Passin 2003-08-27 03:18
00613 Final CFP: XML Database Symposium (XSym03) @ VLDB 2003 akmal chaudhri 2003-08-27 09:12
00611 Namespace declaration and schema validation problems Noelle 2003-08-27 09:42
00622 Need help on JAXB! Srivathsan C 2003-08-27 10:38
00564 Re: [xml-dev] Namespace declaration and schema validation problems Bob Foster 2003-08-27 11:31
00558 xml taxonomy Rick Marshall 2003-08-27 13:21
00566 Re: [xml-dev] Namespace declaration and schema validation problems Thomas B. Passin 2003-08-27 13:27
00553 RE: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-27 13:27
00570 Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) Jonathan Robie 2003-08-27 13:35
00551 Re: [xml-dev] xml taxonomy Chiusano Joseph 2003-08-27 13:37
00609 RE: [xml-dev] xml taxonomy Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-27 13:47
00608 RE: xml taxonomy Nordström Ari 2003-08-27 13:49
00624 Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? Jonathan Robie 2003-08-27 13:51
00625 Re: [xml-dev] xml taxonomy Simon St.Laurent 2003-08-27 13:51
00555 Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model Jonathan Robie 2003-08-27 14:01
00567 Re: [xml-dev] RE: xml taxonomy Rick Marshall 2003-08-27 14:21
00557 Re: [xml-dev] XPath brain teaser Jonathan Robie 2003-08-27 15:11
00563 RE: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? Hunsberger, Peter 2003-08-27 15:12
00633 RE: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) Hunsberger, Peter 2003-08-27 15:14
00584 Re: [xml-dev] xml taxonomy Winchel "Todd" Vincent III 2003-08-27 15:45
00640 The relational model is to data as automata theory is to programs? Mike Champion 2003-08-27 15:47
00597 RE: [xml-dev] xml taxonomy Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-27 15:55
00587 RE: [xml-dev] Namespace declaration and schema validation problems Dare Obasanjo 2003-08-27 16:23
00594 RE: [xml-dev] Need help on JAXB! Dare Obasanjo 2003-08-27 16:24
00641 RE: [xml-dev] XML.Net find node by content and change attribute Dare Obasanjo 2003-08-27 16:25
00631 RE: [xml-dev] xml taxonomy Rodriguez, Sergio 2003-08-27 16:44
00646 RE: [xml-dev] xml taxonomy [email protected] 2003-08-27 16:48
00628 Re: [xml-dev] Namespace declaration and schema validation problems Noelle 2003-08-27 17:22
00586 Re: [xml-dev] xml taxonomy Winchel "Todd" Vincent III 2003-08-27 17:31
00595 RE: [xml-dev] Need help on JAXB! Jonathan Robie 2003-08-27 17:44
00642 RE: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) Jeff Lowery 2003-08-27 18:05
00630 RE: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) Hunsberger, Peter 2003-08-27 18:15
00634 RE: G. Orwell (was: xml taxonomy) [email protected] 2003-08-27 18:28
00639 RE: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? Dave Pawson 2003-08-27 18:29
00596 RE: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) Murali Mani 2003-08-27 18:33
00585 RE: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model [long] Jeff Lowery 2003-08-27 18:42
00600 RE: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? Hunsberger, Peter 2003-08-27 18:51
00582 RE: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard ap proach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-27 18:51
00626 Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? Rick Jelliffe 2003-08-27 18:54
00607 RE: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) Jeff Lowery 2003-08-27 20:04
00554 RE: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) Murali Mani 2003-08-27 20:17
00568 Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) Bob Foster 2003-08-27 23:31
00569 Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) Thomas B. Passin 2003-08-28 00:25
00552 RE: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) Jeff Lowery 2003-08-28 00:29
00623 Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) Mike Champion 2003-08-28 00:38
00610 Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model [long] Thomas B. Passin 2003-08-28 00:44
00612 Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model [long] Mike Champion 2003-08-28 00:46
00620 Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model [long] Thomas B. Passin 2003-08-28 03:05
00679 XML mapping to java objects Kunal J 2003-08-28 09:07
00686 Re: [xml-dev] xml taxonomy [email protected] 2003-08-28 10:11
00660 Re: [xml-dev] xml taxonomy [email protected] 2003-08-28 11:50
00652 Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model [long] Murali Mani 2003-08-28 13:13
00653 Re: [xml-dev] xml taxonomy Murali Mani 2003-08-28 13:28
00659 RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXM L fragments in prose? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-28 13:41
00687 Re: [xml-dev] xml taxonomy [email protected] 2003-08-28 13:52
00685 Re: [xml-dev] xml taxonomy Thomas B. Passin 2003-08-28 14:07
00671 RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXM L fragments in prose? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-28 14:11
00677 Question about UTF-8 Gustaf Liljegren 2003-08-28 14:12
00681 Re: Question about UTF-8 Gustaf Liljegren 2003-08-28 14:15
00664 Re: [xml-dev] Question about UTF-8 Tim Bray 2003-08-28 14:18
00696 Re: [xml-dev] xml taxonomy Murali Mani 2003-08-28 14:20
00700 Re: [xml-dev] xml taxonomy Richard Tobin 2003-08-28 14:24
00701 Linking xml files together Cams Ismael 2003-08-28 14:44
00695 Re: [xml-dev] xml taxonomy [email protected] 2003-08-28 16:05
00670 Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model -- CMM & ISO 9000 - FINAL POST TO BOTH THREADS BY ME. pop3 2003-08-28 16:52
00662 Re: [xml-dev] Question about UTF-8 Tim Bray 2003-08-28 17:01
00666 Re: [xml-dev] Question about UTF-8 Gustaf Liljegren 2003-08-28 17:02
00672 Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model -- CMM & ISO 9000 - FINAL POST TO BOTH THREADS BY ME. [email protected] 2003-08-28 17:21
00661 RE: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) Hunsberger, Peter 2003-08-28 17:37
00674 RE: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model [long] Hunsberger, Peter 2003-08-28 17:44
00702 Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model -- CMM & ISO 9000 - FINAL POST TO BOTH THREADS BY ME. John Cowan 2003-08-28 20:20
00694 freeware command line toolkit for XML Mikhail Grushinskiy 2003-08-28 23:01
00693 Announce: Public XSL training in Europe - September 22-26, 2003 - XML-Dev G. Ken Holman 2003-08-29 02:57
00703 Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model Joe English 2003-08-29 03:40
00673 Re: [xml-dev] Question about UTF-8 Rick Jelliffe 2003-08-29 06:39
00663 XML storage Helena 2003-08-29 08:27
00669 Re: [xml-dev] XML storage akmal chaudhri 2003-08-29 11:20
00665 [OT] Who said the browser wasn't dead? [email protected] 2003-08-29 12:18
00683 XSLT and default namespaces Paul Spencer 2003-08-29 14:16
00682 RE: [xml-dev] [OT] Who said the browser wasn't dead? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2003-08-29 14:26
00654 Re: [xml-dev] XSLT and default namespaces G. Ken Holman 2003-08-29 14:29
00658 RE: [xml-dev] XML storage Michael Kay 2003-08-29 14:49
00657 RE: [xml-dev] Question about UTF-8 Rob McDougall 2003-08-29 15:24
00655 Re: [xml-dev] Question about UTF-8 Tim Bray 2003-08-29 16:04
00680 [xml-dev] Mixed Content Alejandro Lopez 2003-08-29 17:19
00684 Re: [xml-dev] Mixed Content Jason Diamond 2003-08-29 17:44
00678 RE: [xml-dev] Linking xml files together DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO) 2003-08-29 18:03
00688 Avoiding roundoff errors in calculations? Roger L. Costello 2003-08-29 18:57
00698 [xml-dev] Mixed Content Alejandro López 2003-08-29 19:35
00691 Re: [xml-dev] Avoiding roundoff errors in calculations? Tim Bray 2003-08-29 19:56
00667 Re: [xml-dev] Mixed Content G. Ken Holman 2003-08-29 20:47
00676 Re: [xml-dev] Avoiding roundoff errors in calculations? Roger L. Costello 2003-08-29 20:47
00690 RE: [xml-dev] Avoiding roundoff errors in calculations? Klotz, Leigh 2003-08-29 20:51
00675 Re: [xml-dev] Avoiding roundoff errors in calculations? Jonathan Borden 2003-08-29 21:18
00668 Re: [xml-dev] Avoiding roundoff errors in calculations? John Cowan 2003-08-29 21:33
00699 Re: [xml-dev] Avoiding roundoff errors in calculations? Don Bate 2003-08-29 21:47
00692 Re: [xml-dev] Avoiding roundoff errors in calculations? Rick Marshall 2003-08-30 02:30
00697 Re: [xml-dev] Avoiding roundoff errors in calculations? Tim Bray 2003-08-30 03:40
00651 [ANN] xmloperator 2.3 didier demany 2003-08-30 15:36
00656 Native XML databases sridhar dongara 2003-08-31 15:36
00689 Re: [xml-dev] Native XML databases Mike Champion 2003-08-31 15:59