[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce.Cox@USPTO.GOV [mailto:Bruce.Cox@USPTO.GOV]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 1:30 PM
> To: clbullar@ingr.com
> Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is
> XML Really Extensible?
>
> Mr. Snell proposes a solution to some tough problems that Mr.
> Obasanjo thinks, if they are solved, would provide sufficient
> grounds for successfully mixing arbitrary namespaces (that
> is, provide the requisite semantics), and Mr. Bullard points
> out that namespaces are being used to attach semantics to XML.
Nope. Alaric proposes solutions to specific instances of the general
problem of mixing arbitrary XML vocabularies. I don't think solutions to
the general problem are feasible and definitely do not think any of the
current discussions even point in the right direction to solving such a
problem on a decentralized network like the WWW.
Like I said I've bowed out of this thread, however I didn't want to
leave my position misrepresented.
--
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM
Eat right, Exercise, Die anyway.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
|
