[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
I share the problem!
"Raw XML" perhaps?
Michael Kay
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@simonstl.com]
> Sent: 20 August 2003 17:56
> To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> Subject: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset
>
>
> Well, not exactly opposite, but I need a term I can contrast
> with infoset, as in the following usage:
>
> --------------------------
> If we look at this example:
>
> <book id="rt456">My book</book>
>
> From the [MISSING WORD] perspective, we have a start tag for
> a book element which includes some whitespace, then an id
> attribute with a value of "rt456". The start tag is followed
> by the text "My book", which is then followed by the end tag
> for the book element.
>
> From the infoset perspective, we have a book element with an
> id attribute whose value is "rt456", and that element's
> content is "My book".
> --------------------------
>
> "Text" doesn't quite seem appropriate, nor does
> "serialization", "markup", or "XML".
>
> --
> Simon St.Laurent
> Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
> Errors, errors, all fall down!
> http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org
> <http://www.xml.org>, an initiative of OASIS
<http://www.oasis-open.org>
The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
|
