[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill de hÓra [mailto:bill.dehora@propylon.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 3:13 PM
> To: Dare Obasanjo
> Cc: Tim Bray; XML Dev
> Subject: Re: [xml-dev] RelaxNG question
>
>
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part1/#soapbody
>
> I read the section and saw nothing that required the negation
> of non-namespaced names. Unless you're looking to
> overconstrain SOAP, perhaps you can explain your thinking, or
> get back on topic.
"All child element information items of the SOAP Body element information item:
SHOULD have a [namespace name] property which has a value, that is the name of the element SHOULD be namespace qualified."
Of course, nothing stops you from being pedantic and arguing that a SHOULD is not a requirement. There is also http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-rdf-syntax-grammar-20030123/#section-attribute-node which may require banning attributes without a namespace name.
Anyway the point is that there are XML vocabularies that have this characteristic which unfortunately cannot be described by any of the popular XML schema languages.
--
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM
People can be divided into two types: those who still possess a fierce hunting instinct and those who pay to park.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
|
