Lists Home |
Date Index |
Bob Foster wrote:
> From: "james anderson" <email@example.com>
> > > I think Jeni is talking about a datatype library that defines an
> > > canonical representation of QNames used for validation. Forming the
> > > representation requires document context.
> > That does not follow from her text.
> True. She might have meant the other. But in that case, they wouldn't be
yes, no referentially transparent expression for an instance of the
(namespace-name X local-part) relation is a QName. by definition. that's one
of the things which makes these discussions so confounding.