[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Bob Foster wrote:
>
> From: "james anderson" <james.anderson@setf.de>
> ...
> > > I think Jeni is talking about a datatype library that defines an
> internal,
> > > canonical representation of QNames used for validation. Forming the
> > > representation requires document context.
> >
> > That does not follow from her text.
>
> True. She might have meant the other. But in that case, they wouldn't be
> QNames.
>
yes, no referentially transparent expression for an instance of the
(namespace-name X local-part) relation is a QName. by definition. that's one
of the things which makes these discussions so confounding.
...
|
