Lists Home |
Date Index |
- To: "Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)" <firstname.lastname@example.org>,<email@example.com>
- Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible?
- From: "Dare Obasanjo" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 14:45:04 -0700
- Thread-index: AcNhGQGkMURtWTi4TEOiiwoV09u9zwAAeX/w
- Thread-topic: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 2:31 PM
> To: Dare Obasanjo; 'firstname.lastname@example.org'
> Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is
> XML Really Extensible?
> Yet the Microsoft browser does have a way to declare
> semantics based on namespaces, and it doesn't involve RDF or
> neural nets. And it does use namespaces to declare in a
> given document, what the meaningful combinations are. So it
> addresses items 1 through 3 by declaration and does assign
> running code.
This is news to me. Which Microsoft browser is this and what feature of
it are you describing?
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM
Eat right, Exercise, Die anyway.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no