[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- To: "Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)" <clbullar@ingr.com>,<xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible?
- From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 14:45:04 -0700
- Thread-index: AcNhGQGkMURtWTi4TEOiiwoV09u9zwAAeX/w
- Thread-topic: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) [mailto:clbullar@ingr.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 2:31 PM
> To: Dare Obasanjo; 'xml-dev@lists.xml.org'
> Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is
> XML Really Extensible?
>
> Yet the Microsoft browser does have a way to declare
> semantics based on namespaces, and it doesn't involve RDF or
> neural nets. And it does use namespaces to declare in a
> given document, what the meaningful combinations are. So it
> addresses items 1 through 3 by declaration and does assign
> running code.
This is news to me. Which Microsoft browser is this and what feature of
it are you describing?
--
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM
Eat right, Exercise, Die anyway.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
|
