[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Bullard, Claude L (Len) scripsit:
> That is what some are trying to work out. One common approach is to
> ensure that each document in the process covers the contingencies
> for the next step. For example, the workshop is a little dangerous
> if any of the presenters provide information which taints further
> work. In an RFP, one details all obligations for submission including
> for example, recognition that the submitting the material obligates
> the submittor to the IP policies of the organization posting the
> RFP.
The trouble is that (especially with patents) there may be submarines
which neither RFP creator nor proposer is aware of. Your only defense
against this is general anti-patent insurance.
--
The Imperials are decadent, 300 pound John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
free-range chickens (except they have http://www.reutershealth.com
teeth, arms instead of wings and http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
dinosaurlike tails). --Elyse Grasso
|
