[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Simon St.Laurent wrote:
>It may be very naive of me to think this, but something keeps telling me
>that RELAX NG's patterns and RDF's graphs may be able to talk to each
>other in ways that go well beyond the rdf:parseType attribute or XSLT
>transforms between attribute names in a local vocabulary and the rdf:ID,
>rdf:about, etc. I suspect (though I'm still working it out, and don't
>know nearly enough to be certain) that RELAX NG annotations could be
>sufficient to provide a complete mapping from an unchanged XML
>vocabulary to a set of RDF graphs.
>
>
Along these lines, I've been playing around with using RELAXNGCC to
generate RDF triples (this is exactly the annotation idea you outline
above).
I've RELAXNGCC annotated the RDF/XML Relaxng schema itself:
http://www.openhealth.org/RDF/RELAXNGccRDF.rng but unfortunately
RELAXNGCC doesn't yet implement allow this: "attribute with a complex
name class is not supported yet" :-(
This schema/parser doesn't yet deal with bagIds or reification... but
since RELAXNGCC chokes on it, this hardly seems to be its main problem
:-\ oh well...
Jonathan
|
