[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
>
> >There is also
> >http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-rdf-syntax-grammar-20030123/#section-
> >attribute-node which may require banning attributes without a
> >namespace name.
>
> Now that's pedantry. I don't think RDF syntax is amenable to XML
> schemas of any variety (maybe with tons of co-occurrence constraints and
> a lot of open models?),
FWIW, RelaxNG can be used to define the RDF/XML syntax.
http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/#section-RELAXNG-Schema
(the schema has some errors, but is close). Note that when viewed as compact
RelaxNG, the RDF/XML syntax doesn't seem _all that_ complex.
Jonathan
|
