OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help



   RE: xml taxonomy

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]


Isn't XML Information Set what you want here (see http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-infoset/). Taxonomy is defined as the "science and practise of classification" (in my convenient dictionary application), and as far as I understand, that's what the XML Infoset is for. 



Rick Marshall wrote...
> hi all
> following several discussions we've had lately, mostly on relational
> models and document management i'm going to float the idea - which may
> be covered elsewhere, please redirect me if appropriate - 
> that having a
> taxonomy of xml may help us to understand what forms, and 
> when are good
> for different problems.
> if we take numbers as an analogy (and that's all it is, there 
> are plenty
> of others) they can be divided into sets - integer, real, rational,
> irrational, complex, etc and we increase our understanding and use of
> numbers by developing theorems that cover the different sets.
> it seems to me that xml is as diverse as numbers or any 
> similar grouping
> and that by focusing on well defined sets of xml structures and their
> properties we can get the theorems to improve our use and 
> understanding.
> eg one set might be xml with tags only - no attributes; 
> another might be
> xml that is constrained to two levels; etc
> by understanding the properties and operators that are valid on these
> sets we can then see the analogies to other technologies such as
> relational models, markup, etc.
> just a thought at the moment
> cheers
> rick


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS