Lists Home |
Date Index |
Gustaf Liljegren wrote:
> But the question is about general
> ('non-XML-aware') text editors. A general editor has no idea of the
> encoding detection mechanism in XML, so I wonder how it knows that the
> octets C3 A4 should be written 'ä' and not 'Ã¤' (or something else).
It really has no way of knowing, in theory or in practice. This is a
big hairy problem. If you're living in a heterogeneous environment
where there are multiple encodings, this a good reason to insist on XML.
> Many users who see 'Ã¤' when they open a UTF-8 encoded XML document in a
> text editor, prefer to use ISO 8859-1 to avoid this effect.
That only works until you need to use a character that isn't in 8859-1,
such as those used by about two thirds of the world's population.
> Maybe the answer is to stay in ISO 8859-1 (or whatever default encoding the
> editor has), but I was hoping it was possible to recommend using UTF-8 all
> the time (for European scripts).
The notion that you can count on never seeing non-European characters is
a recipe for disaster in today's world. Good solutions are: (a) as you
suggest, use UTF-8 all the time, or (b) use XML for interchange.
Cheers, Tim Bray
(ongoing fragmented essay: http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/)