xml-dev - RE: [xml-dev] Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance?

RE: [xml-dev] Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standar d appr

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: pop3 <lbradshaw@dbex.com>
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standar d approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@datadirect.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 11:18:07 -0400
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
In-reply-to: <5.1.1.5.2.20030825145848.02cfc220@mail.dbex.com>

At 02:58 PM 8/25/2003, pop3 wrote:
>Personally, I would like to see XML proofs in line with Knuth's work and 
>Codd's. Proofs that justify its existence, and define its scope and usefulness.

OK, I'll bite. Which of Codd's proofs did that for the relational model?

Jonathan

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [xml-dev] Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standar d approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
  - From: dbexlist <dbexlists@earthlink.net>

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standar d approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
  - From: pop3 <lbradshaw@dbex.com>

Prev by Date: Re: XML and the Relational Model
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose?
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standar d approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standar d approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread