Lists Home |
Date Index |
I agree. Checkbox compatibility is a good phrase to
describe this kind of design.
From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:email@example.com]
firstname.lastname@example.org (Bullard, Claude L (Len)) writes:
>Is the syntax of InkML really opaque?
1125 18432'23'43"7"-8 3-5+7 -3+6+2+6 8+3+6:T;+2+4:*T;+3+6+3-6:FF;
>But it is still XML.
So long as you wrap it in a start tag and an end tag, base64 is also
InkML has checkbox compatibility with XML. That buys very little.