[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
At 9:24 AM -0400 8/18/03, Chiusano Joseph wrote:
>So in summary, this "data-oriented"/"exchange-oriented" XML was also
>considered to be "record-oriented".
When I say record-like, I'm thinking database like records, not
storage records. Ah, the wonders of English. Perhaps field-like or
table-like might be better?
--
Elliotte Rusty Harold
elharo@metalab.unc.edu
Processing XML with Java (Addison-Wesley, 2002)
http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xmljava
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0201771861/cafeaulaitA
|