xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach

Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 21:09:38 -0400
In-reply-to: <5.1.1.5.2.20030826192416.0231b670@mail.dbex.com>

lbradshaw@dbex.com (pop3) writes:
>I do not feel that a markup language with patched on logic capacity
>can be mathematically shown to be a programming language at all....

XML isn't a programming language.

(You can certainly create programming languages in XML, but I don't
think the XML syntax would affect the provability of those constructs.)

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standardapproach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
  - From: Didier PH Martin <martind@netfolder.com>

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
  - From: pop3 <lbradshaw@dbex.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] XPath brain teaser
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] XPath brain teaser
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standardapproach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS