[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Eric van der Vlist wrote:
> I should have presented Henry's proposal with more context, but the
> advantage of this syntax is that it can be extended to add annotations
> (for the PSVI for instance), solving another issue I have raised a
> couple of time which is that the XML syntax and infoset are not
> extensible.
I see an opportunity to use such a syntax as the primary tree on which XPathNG
would work (seeing *everything* there as annotation). It might be simpler to
start from there and then fall back to shortcuts mimicking XPath 1.0, as it
would give us a consistent model to work on. Thoughts?
--
Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Research Engineer, Expway http://expway.fr/
7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE 8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488
|
