[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christian Nentwich [mailto:christian@systemwire.com]
> The cons (?):
>
> - The files are not recognisable as XML files anymore and the standard
> XML editors won't list them
> - Web servers won't generate the correct headers unless reconfigured
> - The space for 3 digit file prefixes is small, and ours would look
> like .x?? which make sthe space even smaller
>
> Is there anything I'm missing? What are people's opinions on this?
What about appending the file type to the filename, and keep the
xml extension:
blabla1_book.xml
blabla2_book.xml
or book_blabla1.xml
book_blabla2.xml
?
Adrian Maier
|
