[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
jonathan.robie@datadirect.com (Jonathan Robie) writes:
>>I read it as somewhat poor; illegal XML examples, uses the wrong RDF
>>namespace URI, fails to cite the key references of the time on RDF
>>query or RDF/XML (at that date 2001/2002) and said so when it was
>>presented. Somewhat slipshod work showing insufficient care with
>>basic XML or RDF.
>
>Yes, I agree that it lacks some of the secondary virtues that a good
>editor could have caught.
>
>But isn't that like criticizing Bach for his penmanship?
I think it would be more like criticizing him for his inability to play
on-key.
(So far as I know, that wasn't a problem for Bach, though there are
interesting discussions about how notes have drifted over time.)
|
